




For many years you may have wanted to take part in a learning course for a wide variety of reasons but had always put it off. We have all had experiences within learning where things could have been better and this may have proved a real deterrent to getting involved in learning again.
BUT . . .
Whitehaven Adult Education can provide you with a positive and really worthwhile learning experience
Whitehaven Adult Education provides a range of different courses, from academic to more leisure - based courses appropriate for students of all abilities. We offer a relaxed and understanding environment where meeting your needs is our priority. Our enthusiastic approach to learning ensures you receive the highest quality learning experience.
Please take the time to look at our brochure and we hope it will help you feel enthusiastic and motivated to enrol on one of our courses.
If you have any worries about returning to learning or have a disability please contact our staff who will be only too willing to give you any confidential advice and guidance you may need.
We hope you will take the step into learning, as we will be with you all the way!!!
John Barrett
Community Learning Manager
Malcolm Smith - Head of Centre
Whitehaven Adult Education
Whitehaven School
Cleator Moor Road
Whitehaven CA28 8TY
01946 852963
adulteducation@whitehaven.cumbria.sch.uk

This superb print is a reproduction of an original 1802 painting which satirized the quack doctors of the time. The bewigged doctor describes himself as a 'Physic for Man and Horse!', and the signage around him proclaims, inter alia,:
About George Woodward |
| Price: £24.00 |
| UK shipping on this item: £6.00 |
| In stock, usually dispatched within 24 hours |
We know when and where the Victorians lived, this fascinating book explains much about how they lived and it was the world wide web of its day.
Curious fact: Tim Berners-Lee was inspired to invent the World Wide Web after seeing a copy of this book. He even named the early versions of the web ‘Enquire’ after it.

A wrongful death is when a person’s death is caused by third party negligence or recklessness. When a person is wrongfully killed, it is always very traumatic, especially for the wrongful death victim’s family. In cases involving wrongful death, the victim’s death is not expected, which can make the loss more overwhelming for family members. Aside from their grief, families must contend with new obligations, and may face financial hardship. Fortunately, the law protects families of wrongful death victims by allowing them to file a wrongful death claim to recover damages for their losses.
Wrongful Death Claim
In the state of Florida, family members such as spouses, children, or parents may file a wrongful death claim if they have wrongfully lost a loved one due to third party negligence or recklessness. A family member may file a wrongful death claim to recover monetary compensation for:
In order for the family member to file a wrongful death claim, he/she must meet certain requirements. The family member must be of the legal age and the family member must be able to prove that he/she lost his/her loved one as a result of third party negligence. Wrongful death claims are extremely complex and time sensitive. For this reason, any family member wishing to file a claim should seek representation from a skilled personal injury attorney who has successfully handled prior wrongful death cases.
Jacksonville Personal Injury Law Firm – Wrongful Death
The personal injury attorney at the Law Office of Patrick Kelly is committed to providing clients with exceptional legal counsel and guidance. Our goal is to successfully represent families who have wrongfully lost their loved ones throughout Jacksonville, Florida. Our wrongful death lawyer is dedicated to our clients’ needs and we strive to provide each client with the compassion and attention he/she deserves. If you have lost a loved one due to wrongful death, call the Law Office of Patrick Kelly today at (904) 398-6353!

Each time you enter a motor vehicle you are exposed to the possibility of an accident. Motor vehicle accidents can range from minor to catastrophic. In addition, motor vehicle accidents involve complex insurance issues, which can involve multiple insurance companies. As insurance companies hire experienced adjusters and attorneys to defend their interests, an injured accident victim needs aggressive representation by an experienced attorney to protect their rights as well. Our attorneys have an excellent understanding of the intricacies of New York’s No-Fault Law, as well as Underinsured and Uninsured Motorist Coverage issues.
It is therefore important to hire a qualified attorney to perform a thorough investigation, obtain all insurance benefits and ensure that you are adequately compensated.Construction workers are exposed to a wider variety of hazards and face a greater risk of work-related injury or fatality than employees in any other U.S. industry. Construction accidents may include, but are not limited to, roof-related falls, scaffolding accidents, lifting equipment failure, fires and explosions, trench collapses, crane collapses, compressed gases accidents and welding accidents.
If you have sustained an injury while working on a construction site, you may be entitled to seek monetary compensation from the party at fault. New York personal injury law allows victims of negligence to file a civil lawsuit against liable parties to recover damages for their medical expenses, lost wages, physical pain and emotional suffering.
New York Labor Law Sections 240 and 241, are known as the "safe place to work" or the "scaffold" laws. These sections state that if a worker is injured in a New York construction accident as a result of falling from a height, or as the result of being hit with something that falls from a height, the owner and the contractor are responsible. This is true whether or not the worker was at fault or refused to use safety equipment. These laws exist to make certain that all workers have a safe place to work, especially on construction sites.

There are serious long term consequences of exposure to asbestos. Some of these have only recently appeared. The diseases include asbestosis, certain forms of lung cancer and the condition of mesothelioma. Mesothelioma is a cancer of the lining of the lungs known as the mesothelium. Mesothelioma can develop 30 or even more years after exposure to asbestos. These very serious conditions affect people who have worked with asbestos, had loose fibres in their workplace (even from asbestos removal) and people who have been exposed by their family members who may have come home from a hard days work covered in asbestos.
If a loved one has developed one of these conditions and is seriously ill or has died due to asbestos exposure it can easily be proven with medical records. Doctors should be able to confirm causation by asbestos when the diagnosis is made. Compensation is available for Canadians from a number of U.S. trusts set up for that purpose. We need to know the source of exposure to asbestos for us to determine which manufacturer was involved and where the claim may be placed. We do not handle claims related to removal of asbestos from homes or other properties.
Contact the Miskin Professional Corporation Law Offices of Whitby, Peterborough and Toronto, Ontario for information on making a claim. Email miskinlaw@aol.com or call 416-492-0989 from the Toronto area or 877-428-8000 from elsewhere in Canada. You can have us as your lawyers here in Canada and get compensation from the trusts set up to pay claims on behalf of the former asbestos manufacturers. We are working in partnership with experienced reputable lawyers in the U.S. to ensure that Canadians get fair compensation equal to what is available to Americans payable in US dollars. Generally, we need to know the source of asbestos exposure and there has to be significant illness not just fear of future illness to make a successful claim. Cases are handled with contingency fee agreements which include a one third fee shared by the lawyers involved on your behalf. That means you pay nothing until and unless money is received for your claims. Settlements are in US dollars, which now is to our benefit when converted to Canadian dollars. We include the tax in our share of the one third contingency fee so you will not pay extra GST or HST if you live in a Province where the harmonized tax applies. We note that in Ontario this will otherwise add 8% provincial tax to legal fees starting July 2010. Additional cases are being accepted and submitted from clients across Canada. Often we can get clients compensation from more than one settlement trust depending on the source of the asbestos exposure. We are starting to see some large cheques come in for our clients and faster processing of claims. If you are not eligible for Worker's Compensation we can get you compensation. The right to bring a claim may be taken away or reduced by receipt of Workers Compensation Benefits so do let us know details of any WCB or WSIB claims when you first contact us. The Boards have brought U.S. claims for a number of Canadians and where that was already done we can not bring a claim again. Often the Compensation Boards keep all of the money that they recover from U.S. claims as reimbursement for what they paid to the injured worker. We are consulting with the Compensation Boards in different provinces to ensure that our clients actually receive maximum compensation from all sources. In some Provinces Workers' Compensation Boards have allowed us to proceed directly for clients with claims to the asbestos funds where the Boards have rights to make those claims.
We are the leading firm representing Canadians in every province and territory injured by the drug Vioxx, and Murray Miskin has been a lawyer in Ontario practising personal injury law for over 30 years. His first work with Canadian asbestos claims was in 1979. We are settling asbestos injury claims and getting compensation for our clients. Trust us to treat you and your family with compassion and get you results.
For general information on who we are and what we do visit our website
Initially, patients prescribed Bextra were delighted to find that it didn't cause the gastrointestinal problems normally associated with other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs . Unfortunately, after Bextra was approved by the FDA and released to the public, it was determined to have other more dangerous side effects. Bextra has been linked to the following serious side effects:
Bextra is a dangerous drug, and many people are filing lawsuits against the drug marketers, Pfizer and Pharmacia, to recover compensation for their injuries.
If you or a loved one has suffered from the side effects of Bextra, the dangerous drug lawyers at the Law Offices of Michael A. DeMayo, L.L.P. to schedule your
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration on April 7, 2005 asked Pfizer to remove Bextra from the market "because the overall risk versus benefit profile for the drug is unfavorable." Concerns include an increased risk of heart attack, stroke and Stevens Johnson Syndrome, a potentially fatal skin allergy.
The FDA also asked Pfizer to include the government's strictest warning label to its other painkiller, Celebrex. "Today's actions protect and advance the health of the millions of Americans who rely on these drugs every day," said Dr. Steven K. Galson, acting director of the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
In making its decision, the FDA went against the recommendation of a panel of experts that in February concluded the benefits of Bextra outweighed the risk of taking the drug.
A 2004 study presented at a meeting of the American Heart Association had found that patients who took Bextra were more than twice as likely to suffer heart attacks or stroke. The study included 5,930 patients, some taking Bextra and some given a placebo.
"This is a time bomb waiting to go off," Dr. Garret A. FitzGerald, a University of Pennsylvania cardiologist and pharmacologist, told he New York Times after presenting the study data on Nov. 9. "The magnitude of the signal with Bextra is even higher than what we saw in Vioxx.”
Merck & Co. removed Vioxx from the market Sept. 30, 2004. A deluge of lawsuits have followed by people who used the drug and claim to have suffered severe heart attacks and stroke as a result. Many of those lawsuits were filed for patients and their families by Kline & Specter, P.C. If you or someone you know has suffered illness or death as a result of using Bextra, you may want to contact a Bextra lawyer.
One expert, Dr. Curt Furberg, professor of public health sciences at Wake Forest University School of Medicine, who helped conduct the Bextra study, said Bextra presents the same dangers as Vioxx. “Basically, we showed that Bextra is no different than Vioxx,” he told the Times. “And Pfizer is trying to suppress that information.”
Pfizer, the world’s largest drug maker, introduced Bextra in the United States in 2001, two years after Vioxx hit the market. Both are COX-2 inhibitor drugs as is Celebrex, also made by Pfizer.
The Bextra study, which pooled data from patients who participated in a dozen trials, found 2.19 times the number of heart attacks or strokes among patients given Bextra, a pain reliever used to treat osteoarthritis, adult rheumatoid arthritis and severe menstrual cramps.
Bextra has also been linked to a skin hypersensitivity disorder known as Stevens Johnson Syndrome, or SJS, a potentially life threatening syndrome whose symptoms include painful blistering of the skin.
For its part, Pfizer said it disagrees with the latest FDA decision that Bextra should be withdrawn and that it will hold further discussions with the FDA on returning Bextra to the market. Pfizer in the past has denied problems with Bextra for arthritis patients, saying that the only patients who experienced heart problems were those at very high risk for heart disease.
On Jan. 31, 2005, the nation's largest HMO said its pharmacies would no longer dispense Bextra because of safety concerns. Kaiser Permanente, based in Oakland, Calif., serves 8.2 million customers in nine states and the District of Columbia.
On the same day, the national consumer group Public Citizen renewed its call for the FDA to ban both Bextra and Celebrex after revelation of a 1999 study that showed an increased rate of heart attacks and strokes among Alzheimer’s patients.
In the latest news, released Sept. 13, 2006, two new review studies evaluating the safety of COX-2 inhibitors and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) found increased cardiovascular and kidney risks associated with the medications. (See story.)


Shortly after Vioxx arrived in pharmacies, the painkiller became an adman's dream.
During the next five years, Merck spent more than $500 million advertising the medicine. Television ads featured former Olympic ice skater Dorothy Hamill or The Rascals' 1960s anthem, "It's a Beautiful Morning."
One reason for the advertising explosion was obvious. Merck was locked in a battle with Pfizer, which launched Celebrex, a similar drug that hit the market a few months before Vioxx in 1999. Since then, Pfizer has racked up $449 million in Celebrex advertising.
But there may have been another reason for Merck's advertising blitz.
In 2000, a widely publicized study suggested Vioxx may cause heart problems. That same year, Merck spent $160 million on Vioxx ads, double what Pfizer spent, according to TNS Media Intelligence, a market-research firm.
Ultimately, solid evidence did emerge linking Vioxx to heart attacks and strokes, prompting the drug maker late last month to withdraw the drug. Now, critics say such widespread promotion was improper at a time when safety questions remained unanswered.
"I would have liked to have seen less advertising because of the safety issues," said Ed Langston, a physician in Indiana and an American Medical Association trustee. "I had some concerns about the advertising as soon as the safety data started surfacing."
Merck spokeswoman Anita Larsen said the company continues to believe its Vioxx ads were "completely appropriate, based on what we knew at that time." She reiterated the company's position that the 2000 study compared Vioxx with an older painkiller that may have protected patients from heart problems.
The Vioxx recall, though, is prompting fresh concern about direct-to-consumer advertising for prescription medicines. Some doctors and consumer groups say many ads lack important information or coax people to seek expensive drugs when cheaper ones would suffice.
The pharmaceutical industry says such ads are useful tools that offer valuable messages. In an era of rising health-care costs, drug makers say the ads often prompt consumers to pay closer attention to their health and to seek treatments.
Increasingly, drug makers are running TV ads to combat charges of price gouging. The ads boast a commitment to finding cures and saving lives. One Pfizer ad even features its chief executive, Hank McKinnell, making such a speech.
At the same time, Pfizer has a Viagra ad in which a man grows little blue devil's horns as he and his female companion shop for lingerie. One critic believes the ad encourages consumers to abuse the pill and may lead to the spread of sexually transmitted diseases.
"The Viagra ad is completely inconsistent," said Jeffrey Klausner, a San Francisco public health official, who recently petitioned federal regulators to force Pfizer to change its ads. "They're selling sex, and it's over the line."
Dorothy Wetzel, a Pfizer consumer marketing vice president, called the ad "playful," and said its "overall function is closely aligned with a purpose we take seriously: solving a problem that's very real for millions of men."
Overall spending by drug makers on direct-to-consumer ads is big, and getting bigger. Last year, the pharmaceutical industry spent $3.3 billion to advertise medicines directly to consumers, according to Verispan, a market-research firm.
That was triple the $1.1 billion spent in 1997, when the Food and Drug Administration changed its rules. The agency said the move would provide consumers with needed information, but critics say regulators compromised safety -- with Vioxx being the latest example.
"The failure of the FDA and the massive promotional campaigns by Merck, which minimized the potentially serious cardiovascular risks, played a role in misrepresenting the safety of Vioxx to the public," said Sidney Wolfe of Public Citizen, an advocacy group.
One former drug-company executive questioned the wisdom of spending large sums on consumer ads when, in his view, the money could be used more efficiently to target doctors to increase their prescribing.
"I've never seen one study to show the economic benefit is there," said Irwin Lerner, a former chief executive at Hoffman-La Roche.
Nonetheless, experts say little will change. Stuart Klein, president of the Quantum Group, a communications company that specializes in direct-to-consumer ads, said some additional scrutiny may occur, but drug ads are already reviewed very closely.
Arthur Caplan, who heads the Center for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania, said drug makers should readily address challenges to their medicines and respond by conveying important information to doctors. But he didn't predict reduced advertising.
"They won't back off in a competitive marketplace, because the point of the ad is to generate demand," he said. "Look, the world of advertising and marketing has no ethics. But if you allow it, this is what you'll get."

The lawsuit was filed by a NJ-based engineers union on behalf of all health insurers who covered prescriptions for Vioxx, which has been found to double risks of heart attacks and strokes. The plaintiffs alleged that the company covered up evidence of the increased risks, which would have caused companies to purchase other painkillers.
In its decision, the court didn’t evaluate those claims, but simply said that applying New Jersey’s consumer fraud laws to claims made by companies around the country was inappropriate, and that as each company made their coverage decisions on their own, so should they pursue legal remedies individually. In their decision, the judges noted that this was in fact likely to happen, and insurers pledged to do so. Merck also faces another 27,000 individual consumer lawsuits.
Reported the Associated Press:
Chris Seeger, lead attorney for the West Caldwell, N.J.-based union that sued, International Union of Operating Engineers Local 68, said that given the ruling, he will now pursue separate claims on behalf of individual unions.
"Merck temporarily dodged a bullet. Merck didn’t totally dodge the bullet," he said.


You will be spending money up front for the loan, but you will be saving money each month because your . Therefore, you will need to calculate how many months it will take to recoup your up front cost. If you are going to live in the house at least that long, you should refinance.
If, for example, your current mortgage is 8% on a $100,000 loan to be paid in 10 years, your monthly payment is $1213. If you can get that 8% lowered to 6%, your payment will drop by $103 each month. So far, so good.
The lender tells you that you will be paying one point and $2,500 closing costs. The one point is one percent of the loan amount, or $1,000. Added to the $2,500 closing cost, your upfront costs total $3,500. Divide your monthly savings into the upfront costs to learn how long it will take to break even. In this case, $3,500 divided by $103 equals 34, which means you will break even after 34 months.
This is great if you plan to stay in the house for more than 34 months; not great if you think you will be moving soon. If you stay the entire 10 years, you will save a total of $8,860.
Tell your prospective lenders you do not want to pay points or origination fee. With the current competition for these refinance loans, they may just listen. Now is a great so go save yourself some money.
Securities offered through LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC
In todays volatile lending market there is an old standby that is moving forward to a new place in American finance…. The FHA loan.
The History of the FHA The Federal Housing Authority was set up after the depression of the early 1930’s to help Americans recover from the tremendous numbers of foreclosures during the depression and get Americans back into home ownership. Prior to the FHA there were not 30 year loans generally available, people were financing homes with 5 to 10 year loans. FHA may be doing the same thing now as traditional lending goes through it’s changes. Initially and for most of the history of the organization it was completely self funded and did not rely on any taxes for it’s operating capital. It was funded initially by mortgage insurance premiums and appraisal fees. It took till this year for the FHA to come to the Government to help make up a budget shortfall. The predictions are that the FHA will recover as it is the only option for credit challenged borrowers, and is writing a record number of loans.
Today’s FHA We have seen conventional loans tacking on rate increases for borrowers with lower credit scores. A couple of years ago anything above 600 was considered decent while now some lenders are adding 1/2 a point to the interest rate on 30 year fixed rate loans for borrowers with credit scores between 650 and 680 and 1.25% added to interest rates for borrowers with credit scores between 620 and 650. Below 620 is considered “subprime” and the rates rise dramatically. Yet FHA will still make loans to borrowers with credit scores as low as 580. These are 3% down loans with interest rates fluctuating between 6 and 6.25% 30 years fixed. FHA has recently started charging a premium based on credit scores as well. The loan amount has increased to $346,250 recently in most of metro Atlanta. It may now be a better deal for not only credit challenged buyers, but for the mid-range credit purchaser with 650-680 credit scores.
There is a one time mortgage insurance premium of 1.5% of the loan amount which can either be paid in full at closing or added to the loan amount and financed, then there is a monthly mortgage premium which is .5% of the loan amount per year, (1/12 of that paid each month). Conventional loans also have mortgage insurance.
Some of the Guidelines for FHA insured loans after Bankruptcy or Foreclosure
FHA INSURED LOANS are available to people who have had both bankruptcies and foreclosures in their past. There are some restrictions, the borrower must have virtually perfect credit since the bankruptcy or the foreclosure. These loans are also subject also to normal qualifying guidelines with income and debt limitations.
- Chapter 13 Bankruptcy There must be 12 consecutive months of on time payments on all accounts (including utilities, cell phones etc) from the filing of the chapter 13 bankruptcy.
- Chapter 7 Bankruptcy There must be 24 months of perfect credit from the disposition of a Chapter 7 bankruptcy.
- Foreclosure There must be 3 years of perfect credit from the foreclosure.

Unlike debt settlement, filing bankruptcy has the potential to devastate your credit score for years to come. Filing bankruptcy also carries with it a stigma that many people never free themselves of. For these reasons and more, we do not offer support for filing bankruptcy, but we do want to make sure you understand all of the debt relief options available to you.
For certain individuals, debt settlement is a better option than filing bankruptcy, and can protect and preserve your ability to remain creditworthy in the future while providing debt relief in the short-term. How might debt settlement be a preferable alternative to filing bankruptcy?

What If I Have A Bad Credit Rating
For many payday loan lenders, having a bad credit rating, charge-offs, NSF's or if you are in bankruptcy is not a problem in order to get a payday loan. Unlike most other types of loans, a payday loan does not require a credit check. As a matter of fact, some payday loan lenders have services especially tailored for people with bad credit.
Payday loans are a fast, easy and convenient financial product to help you in times when cash is short. When you need some money and you need it now, a payday loan is the simplest solution.

SALEM, Ore. - Since June 1, a total of 60 Oregon payday loan shops have shut down as a result of new state regulations and now, to try and turn the market back in their favor, the payday loan industry is advertising.
For years, the payday loan industry has kept a low public profile - quietly taking blows from consumer advocates and politicians critical of its high interest loans.
Now, a national association of payday lenders is playing offense with a major nationwide ad campaign telling borrowers to use their loans responsibly.
"These changes are part of the ongoing effort we have as an association to respond to concerns by policy makers and to protect the financial well being of our customers at the end of the day," said Lyndsey Medsker with Community Financial Services Association of Washington, D.C.
The man in charge of regulating Oregon's payday lenders, David Tatman with the Department of Consumer and Business Services, said it is safe to say that the payday loan industry is getting nervous and may be trying to boost its image.
"I think what they're trying to do is make sure what happened in Oregon, the need to do that in other states is precluded by this campaign," he said.
Translation - keep other states from capping payday loan interest rates, the way Oregon has, and let Oregon's policy makers know that their industry is being responsible.
KATU News asked people on the street to read the campaign's print ads and they said the campaign is clearly not directed at payday loan borrowers.
"First of all, they're not going to read this," said Mike McNeill.
The ads are lengthy and detailed, not for a consumer on the run.
"Maybe for Congress," said Tina Vanoosten. "Maybe for the politicians who are trying to fight it, but not for the people who are getting the loans, no."
Congress is also looking at payday loan caps and some say that is one of the reasons the industry has fired off this ad campaign.
The industry denies that, saying they are simply looking out for consumers.

Some consolidation companies will not ask you to take out a loan. The service they offer differs from other companies in that they work for a set fee to disperse your payments after they have done their best to have your interest rates lowered or completely taken off your debt. They then put it all together at the lower interest rate and pay each of your creditors every month according to what you have agreed to send them.
Their fees can be large, but many of them are worth it when you find that even by paying them, you are paying out less than before and have the opportunity to pay a little more and get your principal down further.

Are you having trouble every month paying the bills? You can get out of your current dire financial straits. It’s up to you to take control of your debt and start the path to financial stability. The fastest way to do this is by debt consolidation.
Will debt consolidation have a negative impact on ? The answer is yes, but only in the short run. But sometimes taking a step back is the fastest way to get ready to move a few steps forward. If your having serious problems now, the first thing you need to do is find stability. Debt consolidation will give you this much needed stability.
There’s a pretty good chance your credit needs some improving anyway if you’re experiencing debt problems. A home equity loan is the quickest and cheapest way of doing debt consolidation. A lender will be glad to speak to you if you have enough equity in your home to cover your current debt.
A home equity loan can drastically lower your payments because of the difference in interest rates between a home loan and a for example. Try professional if you don;t own your own home right now. A debt consolidation expert can help you set up a good debt consolidation plan.
If you do it right, you will reap the benefits of debt consolidation. A lower interest rate, lower monthly payments and most important, a feeling of financial stability. If you want to get debt consolidation done, find out if there’s a way for you to take out one big loan to pay back your current total debt. Start your road to financial stability today by adhering to these steps.

That is what keeps Belarus based designer Alex Nakobo employed. He redesigns and customizes the interiors of private jets.
With a host of custom designs which are already doing duty in Russian corporate jets, Nakobo can give your jet a lavish luxury interior fit for presidents and royalty.
How do custom leather chairs and wide aisles for a very comfortable and an ultra luxurious flying experience sound? You can even have seat warmers installed, and an ornate dining room for elegant dinners in the sky.
Entertainment is covered with HDTV’s and custom lighting for jet theater viewing. Materials used throughout rage from fine woods to fine leathers, and there is nothing that is not possible for the right price.

After having their corporate plane for only one month, Starbucks is already listing the plane for sale. With only 20 flights on the new the plane should sell well, if there is a buyer that is.
The $45 million Gulfstream G550 was ordered four years ago when Starbucks was enjoying a blissful boom time, unlike the present economy.
The world’s most expensive jet is currently the . At $49.3 million for just the jet itself, no maintenance included, you’ve got to have some very deep pockets or maybe some really good friends.
The Bombardier Global Express XRS Jet can travel up to 6,150 nautical miles at a cruise speed of no less than Mach 0.85. Not too shabby, eh? Well for that kind of cash, I wouldn’t take anything less.
greatest, if you ask me, in the world of light sport aircraft is the Cessna Skycatcher. Quite an eyecatcher, eh?
With a Garmin glass cockpit, Teledyne Continental O-200D engine & all the air you could want, there’s really nothing better than this beauty. How about an introductory cost of just $109,500?
![if>![endif]>